All posts by The Silent Whoopie Cushion

Bacuased in worked in the anti-magic barrier which was design by the travelers to work only with traditional/pure magic.

On whether or not this ability is magical in nature, I would say that it is because:

1) He was from a witch bloodline (witchy-genes)

2) Every supernatural ability seen thus far appears to stem from magic as they don't work in the barrier (compulsion etc.)

3) He couldn't use magic in MF as the magic he absorbed was spirit in nature

Wouldn't that just be ironic that the very ability modern witches viewed to be an "Abomination" was actually the purest, most original magic?

One of the reasons she created the original vampires was so they were protected from the werewolves before then, thay hid in caves provided by nature. But if they could have controlled their transfomrations, then there wouldn't have been any conflict and Henrik wouldn't have died.

The spell seemed fairly easy to do so mass production wouldn't have been an issue.

If you had said Mikael was too prideful to allow them to be even more powerful, i presume these rings are much like daylight rings and that the witch that casts it has the power to dispel it any time. This in turn would have given the Mikaelson's some leverage and be a powerful family through Esther.

Additionally, which werewolf wouldn't want the pain of their transformation to end. Esther was the sole witch with the spell. With HIGH demand & LOW supply, the Mikealson's could have been wealthy beyond their imagination selling these shit in a village FULL of werewolves.

I honestly have no idea, it seems plausible as they are now partially transformed with science. Dr. Whitmore showed that a science element to Vamparism does exist. (Furthermore, science is the study of nature and Magic uses nature so...) Perhaps their daylight rings still wouldn't work but hypothetically, would they be able to enter in to MF at night?

Thoughts?

Here are my thoughts on the anchor.

1) Being the anchor makes you the Ultimate medium of sorts, you can see and touch ghosts. You are basically the "Original Medium" right?

i think that while an anchor is half on the other side and half on the living, a medium (or ressurected person) has a slight footing on the other side thus allowing you to see ghosts but not touch them.

2) Did Bonnie just became a PARADOX ANCHOR? i feel like being the anchor did not ressurect her, instead it lifted off her veil, and only her veil, allowing her to interect with the living.

she is half on each side but is still technically a ghost unlike Amara who was (in her last moments) a human anchor. i say this because Tessa needed an immortal being to carry the other side's burden which is why she chose Bonnie because she can't die.

Am i correct? is Bonnie immortal? ( i mean she a ghost so she's just gonna revive like Vaughn in S04) so does that mean she has became a paradox. killing her would not destroy the other side anymore cause she's just gonna come back from the there?

3) Also, why didn't Bonnie remember touching amara when she died in S04? or anybody else for that matter? Rose? Anna? Alaric? Jeremy?

"So how's it like over there "

"Oh, it's not so bad, i like it here. although, i had to touch this creepy statue to cross the other side. actually...it looks a lot like Elena..."

Nature always needs a balance.

What if Qetsiyah (or Tessa) ressurecting herself was the true reason Bonnie died in Graduation.

I was thinking maybe Bonnie might have suffered consequences from bringing Jeremy back but maybe not resulting her death like when she lost her power ressurrecting Jeremy the last time or something like that.

Qetsiyah is more of Bonnies' Equal, power-wise, and therefore more apporpriate to be her 'Balance'. What's more they are blood-related and there's why no one else but bonnie could take her place on the other side.

I know she could have just possessed someone else like esther did but given her talents (immortality spell & other side creation), i'd say she's more than capable of full ressurection but at a cost. Of course, if she was so powerful, maybe she didn't need that balance and maybe so does bonnie. Then again, she is shown to be a crazy & vengenful b*tch who wouldn't let anyone stand in her way, who's to say she wouldn't sacrifice her own decendent for revenge.

idk... Thoughts?

Has it occur to you how the different degrees of magic seem to coincide with the various degrees of immortality?

Spirit magic: Allows witches to slow their aging (Longevity)

Dark magic: Created vampires (Semi-Immortality)

Expression: Created Silas (True Immortality)

Its interesting to that the more 'Immortal' it is the more ungoverned by nature its magic is :)

Now imagine Bonnie Making her own immortality spell

• Spirit + Dark + Expression = Perfect Immortality???

At this point it is all just a theory, but im beginning to wonder if the part of the legend about Qetsiyah being in love with Silas was also a lie. Think about it:

- Like the Sun & Moon curse and the origin of the Immortality spell, the legend could have all been a lie.

-The fact alone that she did not have any role in the creation of the immortaility spell meant that she would not have killed Silas's lover out of jealousy

- MOST IMPORTANTLY: the fact remains that the bennett line (decendants of Qetsiyah) exist.

Qetsiyah must have had a child in order to create the bennett line. if she was so in love with Silas that she 'Killed his lover', wouldn't that be weird to have some other lover to sire a child of her own?